Tag Archives: Harriet Harman

Labour Party, Politics

Diary of a Frustrated Labour Supporter – Week 6

Saturday 13th June

Keep remembering that only 24% of the electorate voted Tory and now we need to live through a Conservative MAJORITY for the next 5 years. All those things they are doing, including £12bn welfare cuts, and they justify it by saying the country voted for it; well, the majority of us didn’t. But they don’t care.

And thankfully Jim Murphy has stayed on for a few weeks to look at plans to modernise the way the Labour Party operates in Scotland; they appear sensible and realistic and hopefully will encourage people to vote labour again, because if they don’t, we will never win another general election.

Sunday 14th June
It really feels like some of Cameron’s backbenchers dislike him as much as I do; his approach, how he runs his government, his views on Europe. This could be good for us!

With one day to go before the nominations close I continue to move more towards supporting Yvette. Her priorities seem to be business, jobs and women…all of which are critical to the success of the country and of individuals. Andy’s coming across as a bit smug and, with support coming from the likes of Luciana Berger; that is a worry! And Liz might as well be a Conservative – supporting ‘free schools’ should not be Labour Party policy.

However, I do like Andy’s suggestion of a UCAS style application process for technical, non-university based apprenticeships; it would raise the profile of apprenticeships, help young adults gain skills and knowledge whilst at work, ensure that apprenticeships are open to all and ensure that those who do not want to go to university have a high quality alternative.

Monday 15th June
Pleased that Jeremy has enough nominations to get him onto the ballot paper. I don’t want him to win, but I do want him to be part of the debate. I want his view of the Labour Party and of Britain to be debated openly and then those who are eligible can vote for whoever they feel is best to run the party and be a potential Prime Minister – although those two things do not always sit comfortably together.  His supporters will get the opportunity to vote for him and the country may understand a little more about the Labour Party; there is a risk to that, but I believe it is worth it. Unless you follow politics or have been brought up with an appreciation of what the Labour Party is about, most people either link it to ‘the unions’ or to ‘Blair’; there is more to supporting the Labour Party than unions and Blair and this is our opportunity for a national debate with all the nominated leaders participating truthfully. I have to admit I’m quite looking forward to it – can’t wait for the first set of televised hustings on Wednesday.

And finally, please don’t start thinking about changing the rules about ‘how to get rid of the leader’. We had the opportunity to change the rules when we changed the rules for picking the leader; this is not the right time.

Tuesday 16th June

The EU debate is being given a significant focus. It’s a critical issue, and when 27 Tory MPs vote against their Government that is always interesting, but Labour should be taking the lead on continuing to focus on other, domestic issues which should not be forgotten. For instance, why isn’t Labour talking about the report from Citizens Advice Bureau that shows spiralling rents for substandard accommodation are causing increasing health problems? The report shows an increase in the number of people the CAB are seeing who are getting into debt due to rent arrears and the initial deposits and rent advances required by many landlords. These are the kind of issues our shadow cabinet should be discussing; they may not yet have all the answers but they can say ‘this is wrong, it should not be happening, the Conservative Government is not helping everyone, it is not a One Nation Government and people’s lives should be better than this’; fundamentally it’s quite an easy message.

Wednesday 17th June
So we now also have our 5 deputy leadership nominations; it’s been a low key campaign to date but one which I think will become quite interesting. I’m glad Stella Creasy has got through; she is the one I’m keen to see if she develops over the next few months into a potential deputy. In fact it’s quite a strong field and might make the leadership campaign appear a bit dull.

Good news about earnings and unemployment…the former is up and the latter down! The huge grin on Osborne’s face whilst he’s eating his muesli this morning is too much to picture. He even got the chance to stand in for Cameron at Prime Minister’s Questions today – part 1 of his interview to be the future leader of the Conservative Party. Osborne’s ‘Bennite’ quip was misplaced and not funny but, other than that, he did well – I quite liked his style; at least he actually answered the questions and did not do ‘a Cameron’ – answering a question with a question! Hilary Benn was very good; his focus on ISIS, terrorism and refugees was clever and demonstrated Osborne’s slight discomfort on non-economic issues; his concise questions, sensible and constructive follow-up comments and calm, knowledgeable manner was refreshing. Why is he not standing as leader?

And even I forgot to watch the leadership debate…which probably means hardly anyone else was watching BBC2 at 7pm tonight. I did get round to watching it later and pleased I did, even though I probably didn’t learn anything new. But it was interesting to see what role they wanted to portray -they reminded me of a family – the passionate, grumpy granddad, the sensible, boring mum, the cheeky, down to earth son (and head boy) and the lucky, smarmy daughter (and head girl). They all responded to type but I did enjoy watching them -Andy was a bit too pushy and had too many stock answers he wanted to get out, Jeremy answered the questions truthfully demonstrating his labour party values, Liz was clear and honest (you get what you see ie. a Tory) and Yvette was dull and a bit too reserved. The audience was interesting though; by picking people who may vote Labour in the future or who have voted Labour in the past then maybe I shouldn’t be surprised about the cheers and claps for Jeremy; they appeared to be an audience of ‘sympathetic socialists’ who they want the party to be more distinctive…setting ourselves apart from the Tories. They certainly weren’t the average person on the street and a typical member of the public – those who do not have any socialist leanings, who have hardly ever voted Labour (although they may have voted for Blair) and those who we really need to understand.

Could Jeremy really end up our leader? If all the conservatives are really joining up to be able to vote for him to be leader and, seeing how well he was received tonight, I am worried. If he did get elected he would have to withdraw or turn it down…wouldn’t he?

Laura K for leader!

Thursday 18th June
Tactics, tactics, tactics!

It was tactical to ensure Jeremy got onto the ballot paper but now so many people are worried about Jeremy getting all the limelight and that voters may realise that some people in the Labour Party support what he is saying! Horror! Is that really a problem? A leader must be authentic and say what they really believe, however, they also need to listen to those they are there to lead. So is the leader of the Labour Party there to lead the party, be a potential leader of the whole country or both? I know it’s both, but if what the Labour Party wants is not what enough of the country wants then the leader either has to shift the party’s thinking or the country’s thinking or bring them together on common ground. I am not convinced that any of the potential leaders are willing to do that. We will have to see.

Also, I hope the tactical voting that appears to have happened in relation to the chairs of the Parliamentary Select Committees doesn’t reduce the quality of their work. They have often been the only place where real scrutiny and accountability has taken place; it certainly doesn’t happen in the main chamber.

And finally, what a clever tactic to get Alan Johnson to head up the Labour Party YES campaign for the EU Referendum. He will be seen as a normal person with normal concerns with clear answers. Hopefully he will attract a broad spectrum of people who will vote YES in 2017 and will hopefully be attracted to vote Labour in 2020.

Friday 19th June
Still waiting for Tristram to comment on the OFSTED inspector ‘sackings’. I assume the Labour Party does have a view? If the quality of inspectors has not been good enough then the quality of their reports may not have been good enough which could mean schools have been wrongly rated, parents and children provided with false information and teaching careers affected. If we don’t have a view on that then what do we have a view on? The Labour Party must speak up and speak out.

He also may want to think about the future of GCSEs…the comments from the CBI has made me think about alternative examination systems so hopefully the Labour Party are doing the same! I’m beginning to think that exams should take place throughout a child’s upper schooling (from 14 years) culminating with focused exams at 18 (not 16) when they leave the secondary education and training system. This system would provide young adults with qualifications in subjects they have been taught in, combined with skills and knowledge in subjects they no longer want to take any further. A range of qualifications would capture what they have learnt, and the skills they have acquired to that level, rather than just allowing them to give up subjects with no demonstration of what they have achieved in their first 10 years of education. As young adults move up towards their exams at 18, they would begin to specialise but maths, English and some type of computing/IT subject would need to be compulsory up to 18 (but not necessarily up to A level). A range of qualifications, reflecting what children have learnt up to 14 and onwards, allowing some specialisation at 17 and 18 is a one possible option. Come on Tristram, put on that creative hat, challenge the status quo if it is not working for all children and come up with a forward looking examination structure that is right for children and their future employers. That is what Labour should be here to do!

Standard
Labour Party, Politics

Diary of a Frustrated Labour Supporter Week 5

Saturday 6th June
With Farage the self proclaimed leader of the NO vote campaign that may be good for us YES voters. However, he does have a knack of whipping up support with his ‘down to earth’ lingo and exaggeration of the problem and his ability to solve it…so I am a bit worried. I think the YES campaign has Mandleson at the moment which, sadly, is no contest. We will have to get some more charismatic leaders to front the YES campaign if we’re going to get over the 50% mark…and not Blair. Hopefully Mandleson will get his Manchester University job and that will keep him busy!

Sunday 7th June
And so we have the first split in the Tory party. I shouldn’t really rejoice, but…YIPEE! It looks like 50 Tories want to vote NO and Cameron won’t want that. Is this the beginning of the end? We’ll see. I wonder how many of them will move over to UKIP.
Could sense Andrew Marr’s frustration with Liz today…she wasn’t keen on answering his specific questions. It’s OK to say we need to focus on the ‘ big issues’ but a potential leader must also have a view on detailed policy. I agree with her that we need welfare reform, we need fiscal credibility and responsibility and we need growth in all parts of the country but she speaks in a disconnected way that does help me warm to her.
It’s interesting that Alistair Campbell thinks the Labour Party may not have yet reached the bottom; even though I don’t want to, I tend to think he may be right. Getting the Labour Party to be a ‘political movement’ again may be one way but it will be a difficult thing to achieve…thinks we can do it and I like her optimism. I think she would do well as our deputy leader, but we have to find a reason for people to want to vote Labour. But do you need to be involved in the political movement to vote for it? I’m not that involved in the party, on a day to day basis, but I am a member and I vote Labour…but I do not feel part of a political movement.

Monday 8th June
Ahhh! We all seemed to have misunderstood what Cameron was saying about his ministers having to agree with the YES vote or otherwise they need to resign from the Government! I don’t think every journalist could be wrong…he’s just running scared! A huge U-turn that Cameron is going to have to deal with in the future.
Jeremy Corbyn speaks so naturally, you feel he actually believes in what he is saying..not like some of the other leadership contenders! I actually agree with a lot of what he is saying…equal society, nobody needing to live in poverty, decent housing for all…but I fear we no longer live in a country that supports his kind of beliefs. People seem to be much more selfish and focused on the individual…ie. themselves!

Tuesday 9th June
Labour Party leadership nominations are open…it’s going to be so exciting! Or not! On the first day Andy has got most MP support so far…not surprised, and at least he is now acknowledging how good the Labour Party 2015 manifesto was, focusing on reducing inequality.
And what a day of the bizarre! Harriet’s comments are bizarre…no real Labour Party supporter was relieved we didn’t win; of course we wanted to win. It would have meant we could have implemented our policies that would have supported those who really need help, those on low wages, those who rent, those who do not want to be on zero hour contracts. Surely that is better than having a Conservative MAJORITY? And Nicola on an American talk-show! She actually came across really well. She doesn’t seem to be afraid of saying or doing anything…which is good to see in a politician…a female Farage; maybe the Labour Party leadership contenders can learn from her!
But it looks like 16 and 17 years olds may not be able to vote in the EU Referendum. Very disappointed. It would be a fantastic opportunity to get young adults engaged in politics and would ensure the debate on both sides was clearly and fully articulated – a real shame. Let’s hope the Lords get an amendment through which the Commons will eventually support.

Wednesday 10th June
So, we’re going to sell off RBS for a loss and this is a good thing! I’m not convinced and don’t really understand the rush to sell it off – apart from the political reasons, i.e. getting the bad stuff done early in the Government. And whether his announcements that all future governments will ‘need to have budget surpluses’ is also the right thing for the economy who knows. All we do know is that he probably wants to be Conservative leader and will say and do anything to get that job.

Thursday 11th June
All parties have their own factions so I’m not surprised that a group of labour MPs want to push forward and create a Pro-European campaign group. Supposedly Harriet is worried but I’m not too sure why; it is in line the party view. We should allow each MP to campaign and vote as they wish to…a true free vote; it is the right thing to do and it would demonstrate to the public that this should not be a party political issue…it is a cross party, country wide issue. There will be labour voters who want to leave the EU and those who want to stay, there will be Tories who want to leave the EU and those who want to stay, ditto SNP voters and Liberal Democrat voters; although that is probably not the case for UKIP voters! The Labour Party should come out and allow a free vote; take the initiative and don’t worry about being seen as being too attached to the Tory agenda. Define our own agenda.
And once again the Tories have forgotten their One Nation mantra. Cutting support greats to students from less well off families does not encourage and support those who really need help to improve their levels of education and get skills for improved their job opportunities. And turning unemployment benefits into loans may save £5bn from the welfare bill but burdens the low paid with debt which have an impact on their ability to pay for food, housing, transport…it doesn’t appear to ‘be on the side of working families!

Friday 12th June
And now there are 4; tonight we say goodbye to Mary Creagh who has withdrawn from the leadership contest. I am not surprised as she seemed unable to get the momentum behind her campaign. It is now critical that Jeremy Corbyn gets his 35 nominations so that members have a real choice in this election…every MP should back someone and there must be some who would like to nominate Jeremy – so have the guts to do so and don’t grumble about the outcome when you don’t get the person you wanted. My heart is sympathetic to Jeremy but my mind seems to be moving towards Yvette…let’s see what the next few weeks bring.

Standard
Politics

Diary of a Frustrated Labour Supporter Week 2 1/2

Saturday 16th May

I am frustrated. I am in a dilemma.  One week of a Conservative MAJORITY and I’m finding it hard to reconcile the thoughts in my head. Do I trust the people and voters in this country to make the right decision? I should do. I need to. I want to. But what if they have made the wrong decision? But, what is the wrong decision? One that I don’t think it right? But it may be the right one for them? Who am I to say? People will vote for the person and/or the party they think best suits them and we should respect that and live with the outcomes.

And why don’t people vote? Do they really think politics has no impact on their life? Do they really want politicians to go away and leave them alone? I fear they might.

This is a much bigger problem than I had originally thought. If people don’t understand why we have a government, what their role is, what they do and what would happen if we didn’t have a government we can vote for then no wonder they don’t see a reason to vote. If so many people don’t vote then we don’t live in a democracy; current Conservative MAJORITY voted by less than 25% of the electorate is not democracy in action.

Why is learning about government and politics not part of the school core curriculum? Teenagers should learn the basics (at least) and then they have a choice in the future whether to vote. Don’t think it should be compulsory; people should want to vote, understand why they should vote…give people a reason to vote.  If the turnout in Scotland for the Independence Referendum can be nearly 85% then why can’t that be the case for the general and local elections? That would make it more democratic.

The Labour Party needs to demonstrate how it will enable people to improve their lives, provide them with equal opportunities and support their future aspirations…do not like that word and vow not to use it again…but it does encapsulate the fact that people want to improve their lives as much as they can, however big or small that change may be. People need to stop seeing the Labour Party as a group of people who will stop them from doing the things they want to do, who will limit their ability to improve their lives and who will restrict their choices. They need to support and enable…provide the best environment for people to thrive in, but not do it for them. People want to be in control of their own destinies.

The Labour Party needs to care and be seen to care about the things the people in this country care about; otherwise people will just not vote and that is worse.

Sunday 17th May

What is it about Nicky Morgan than makes me really dislike her? She often talks a lot of sense; parents do not want failing schools, they want their child to fulfil their potential and do their best but, I always think she has a hidden agenda (or not so hidden) – getting rid of Local Authority controlled schools seems to be the only real agenda she has!

The way she talks about ‘average results’ annoys me so much. ‘Average results’ (whatever they may be) may be fantastic results for some children who should be praised and celebrated. Nicky…we don’t all get A*s! Children in your world may do so, but that is not the real world. In the real world children want to do their best, fulfil their potential; they want to be provided with the education and taught the skills to help them get the best results they can and enables them to get the knowledge, skills and qualifications to provide them with choices for the future.

With 32% of all MPs and half of Cameron’s new cabinet having been privately educated are they really the best people to fully understand how a state sector education system should provide the best education for all children? I have my doubts!

Setting up free schools and academies does not necessarily mean better education for children; providing more choice where choice is not needed and schools where schools are not needed is not necessarily the answer. Taking schools out of local authority control does not improve schools or the education of children….although you seem to think it does. Heads, Governors and teachers run schools regardless of whether they are overseen by LAs or the Government! Local Authorities do need to do more to ensure they take action, quickly and decisively, when a school is not doing the best for children, and not left to drift. I realise this is more difficult for them to do when their funding has been so radically reduced but this is the challenge they must cope with otherwise people will lose faith in their ability to be responsible for education.

And where is Tristram Hunt? He should be putting forward the opposition’s view…supporting what is right, providing better alternatives…that is what the opposition does, or at least should do? I know he has MPs to sign up but he will have to learn to multi-task!

Time to stand up to the Union bosses – they are there to represent their members not to run the Labour Party. They have a role to play in supporting people in the workplace (like they do for me and my colleagues) but their relationship with the party is out of date. They cannot hold the party to ransom.

But I must remain optimistic even if Cruddas appears downhearted…but is he right? Are we really in a crisis from which we may never return? We do need to rethink what the party is for, who it represents and what the party is meant to be about. Surely we represent people who want to be given the same opportunities to make the most of their lives as anyone else regardless of who they are, where they live and what their background is. We have not been good at communicating a clear message but the Party is not over and done with. We lost badly, but I will not admit long term defeat. Although with Farage staying on for another 20 years, labour does have something to worry about!

Monday 18th May

Another day, another ‘headline grabbing’ policy announcement from our new Conservative MAJORITY government……a 7 day NHS…even though we already have a 24/7 NHS….I think someone needs to tell them.

The NHS doesn’t actually close down at 5pm on a Friday…although looking at the number of people working in our hospitals, GP and community services patients may think that is the case…we just allow Consultants and other clinicians not to work at the weekends (unless we pay them a lot of extra money) and therefore they choose not to…wouldn’t you? Goodness knows where the money will come from to pay for a 7 day NHS; it won’t be cheap.  If we are truly going to have our NHS providing the same service to people on a Sunday as it does on a Tuesday, then more people will have to work at the weekend. But we will need to continue needing people to work during the week and at nights so we will need more people which will need more money.  And we’ll need more social care services and home care staff available and not too sure who is going to pay for that. If there is not enough money for this the other option is to have fewer hospitals and services but open for more hours…but that will mean reducing the number of hospitals, GP surgeries and I don’t think the government want that to happen …the public will hate it and no political party will support it! So what do they really mean by 7 day NHS or is it just a headline to grab the attention and to make people think the NHS is safe with the Tory’s? I suspect the latter.

Oh, and by the way Andy, why aren’t you responding to Cameron’s announcement. Yes, I know you’re out (everywhere) talking about being the change leader, but you have a shadow job to do too! Yes, you did perform well on the Andrew Marr show (I did go to mass but watched it on iPlayer) but don’t get too cocky. A few lessons from watching how Alan Johnston presents himself on TV as ‘the man for all people’ is welcomed but you will need to have some substance too. However, he does have Rachel Reeves on his side and she’s brilliant, so I’m beginning to warm to him!

Hooray to Harriet. Opening up the Labour leadership vote to the voting public is a clever idea. It’s risky but it is a way of reaching out to the public, getting them involved and counter-balancing the internally focused discussions Labour Party MPs and members are so good at!

Tuesday 19th May

And yet another labour supporter tries to distance themselves from Ed…Yvette, did you really have to? I so want you to do well in this election but this is not the way to go about it. It wasn’t all bad, a lot of it was good and you should say so.

Conservatives putting positive spin on deflation announcement. It may be good now, and I’m sure we’ll enjoy the lower prices, but don’t think we’ll be smiling in a few months and years.

Experiencing withdrawal symptoms from not being able to watch Daily Politics…life doesn’t seem to be the same without a daily dose of Andrew and Jo.

And I know I should not relish in other party’s misfortunes and in particular to Farage’s predicament, but I do like to hear that those around him seem to be waking up to his true self and quitting whilst ahead.

 Wednesday 20th May

Disappointed Tristram has decided to pull out for the leadership election; I really thought he would have gone down well with the public. Looks like MPs are not taking Harriet’s comments into account…that the party should elect someone that the public would vote for, not just someone the MPs like…will we ever learn? Also, nothing comes from potential or actual leadership contenders slagging each other off; we and they will need to work together post 12th September 2015. Also now calling for the party to be able to get rid of its leader more easily BEFORE we have even selected the leader doesn’t provoke an atmosphere of support; I understand what Tristram means but his timing is not helpful.

Fantastic meeting a friend today who was still keen to chat about the election…not many of them around. I had been thinking everyone had forgotten we are only on Day 12 into the Conservative MAJORITY; in the last few days no one wants to talk about it and it looks like the country has moved on. I know we have to accept the outcome of the election but it doesn’t mean we need to forget why it happened and what we can do to change the result in the future.

Brilliant to hear business supporting membership of the EU, but where is the Labour Party? Again, they can’t ignore the fact that life and political debate will take place and they need to be part of it.

Thursday 21st May

So what bit of compassionate Conservatism didn’t Teresa May hear or understand? If people are here illegally and work illegally then that should be against the law and action should be taken against them and their employees. But the tone of the announcement is wrong and is only there to hit the headlines. Of the 300,000 new immigrants I would imagine only a small % are illegally working here; this problem does needs to be tackled with greater focus and resources, but most of the new immigrants will be here legally and working legally.

School presentation tonight to parents has reminded me how Gove wanted to turn the clocks back and how Morgan seems to be continuing the ‘backwards way forward’ – O-level type exams, A levels examined at the end of two years , no coursework, no continuous assessment. I believe there need to be some improvements to the exam system but we need one that is able to demonstrate what each child can do…what knowledge they have AND what skills they have; stretching the most able is the right thing to do but not giving all children the opportunity to get qualifications which demonstrate what they can do is not the right thing to do….and I fear that these changes will not achieve it. And what is the Labour Party view on this? Who knows? They’re all off smoozing with the MPs and union leaders to get support for their (and their friends’) leadership campaign rather than putting discussing what they think is the best way of delivering en education system for all.

Friday 22nd May

Do 40% of the country really want to leave the EU? That is a scarily high figure and too close to the 50% required to take us out of the EU in the referendum. I hope the YES camp make the case to stay in the EU clearly and convincingly because I fear people’s gut feeling is to leave because they equate the EU (wrongly) to immigration, lack of control, waste and inefficiency.

Justine Greening is the face of compassionate conservatism. I know her job makes it easier for her to show her humanity, but she does seem to be a nice person too!

Is Liz Kendal for real? Really, supporting free schools? Does she not realise that free schools are established by those who are able to do so…not everyone has the knowledge, ability and capability to create a free school that suits their child? Those that create free schools are not thinking about the wider community…if they were they would work with their local authority to improve the existing schools not just build a new one and let the old ones wither?

However, I have to admit I do agree with ‘Lizzie’ that ‘ public services should revolve around the person and not the other way round’. Too many of our services…the NHS, social care, education…seem to be built around the people who work for them not the people they provide services to. I appreciate that those providing those services should have good pay, training and appropriate holidays and time off, but these should not be the main drivers and can be given whilst providing a service the people need. Many public services, particularly the NHS, need to be reformed…start having outpatient clinics and GPs open when people need them and are able to attend, not when doctors want to make themselves available.

Maybe Justine and Liz should switch parties.

Saturday 23rd May

Thought of the Day: Where I live contains a real mix of people….those who work and those who don’t…those who can afford to buy good food and those who can’t…those who send their children to state schools and those who don’t…those who own property and those who don’t…those that can afford holidays and those who can’t…those who have qualifications and those who don’t…those who have a pension and those who don’t…those who get a regular wage and those who don’t…those who are ill and those who aren’t……..But I am confident that, whoever you are and whatever our circumstances, we all want a government that treats us all as equals and enables us to have the same choices and opportunities as anyone else in the country.

The labour party has the opportunity to represent the 76% of the electorate who did not vote Tory just over two weeks ago in the election. This government wants to create divisions between people and nations…we need to find a way to ensure this does not happen.

Sunday 24th May

So she does exist and talks sense; she may well get my vote; at last Mary Creagh has came out of her hiding place. For all our sakes let’s hope she gets 35 MPs to support her, she should do as I believe she may be the public’s favourite and a person they may vote for.

And Cameron is so kind to give his ministers a pay freeze for the next five years. Does he not realise that nearly everyone in the public sector has had to do this for the last five years. If he thinks this equates to ‘we’re all in it together’ try telling that to the families who will feel e real impact of the reducing the benefits cap by nearly 10% or to those who are going to get their child benefit squeezed in the next five years. Headline gestures don’t fool me…but they do seem to fool a lot of people; that is worrying.

Monday 25th May

Young adults aged 16-18 must be able to vote in the EU referendum. The decision that will be made will impact on their lives, their opportunities and their country. It will be a great opportunity to explain the pros and cons to our young adults so they understand the full range of arguments and to get them involved in democratic decision making. I am sure it would also help young people get involved in politics in a more proactive manner, which may rub off on a few of the older adults in the country! If Scotland can do it then the UK can too.

Standard